Events and logical statements
Note that while an experiment can only produce one outcome (out of many possibilities), this is not so for events. Given two events and , it is possible that neither of them occur, only one of them, or both.
You roll a die. Consider the events
and
If the outcome is , event occurs. If the outcome is , both events and occur, if a occurs, event occurs and for any other outcome neither nor occurs.
Let's say we have the two events and . Often we are not interested in the occurrence of and , but rather if they both occur in the same experiment, of if only one of them occurred and not the other, and so on.
Set theory allows us to formulate such statements in a simple way. Indeed, if you revisit the example above, note that and occurs in the same experiment if the experiment has produced an outcome that is in both events and . In other words, and both occur if the outcome is in the intersection between and .
or occurs if the outcome is in , or in , or in both, that is, the outcome is in the union of and .
And does not occur if the outcome is not in , that is, the outcome is in the complement .
Let us summarise:
Consider two events and of a random experiment. Let us perform the experiment.
- and occur if the outcome is in and , that is, the event occurs.
- or occurs if the outcome is in or , tat is, the event occurs.
- does not occur if the outcome is not in , thus in , that is, the event occurs.
Note that we do not necessarily need to know the possible outcomes of a random experiment - often we are just dealing with events. See the exercises below.
We regard the weather forecast for tomorrow as a random experiment. Consider the two events
- ="the sun shines"
- ="it is windy"
Express the following events using and , and the set operators intersection, union, and complement.
- It is windy and the sun shines.
- It is windy or the sun shines.
- It is not windy
- It is not windy and the sun shines.
- It is either windy or the sun shines (but not both).
- It is neither windy nor does the sun shine.
Also ... why can and not be outcomes?
Solution
- or we could also write
and are no outcomes because both and can occur in an experiment. But for a random experiment, only one outcome can to occur.
We regard the prediction if the two student Albert and Beth are late at school as a random experiment. We define the two events
- ="Albert is late" and
- ="Beth is late".
Express the following events as logical statements:
Solution
- Albert is in time (is not too late).
- Albert and Beth are late.
- Albert or Beth are late (one of them or both)
- Albert is late and Beth is not late
- Either Albert or Beth are late, but not both.
- Albert and Beth are not late together.
Mutually exclusive events
Two events and of a random experiment are called mutually exclusive, if the sets and are disjoint, that is, they do not have a common outcome. Clearly, at most one of those two events can occur if an experiment is performed.
We can generalise this concept to more than two sets. Three events and are called pairwise mutually exclusive, if , , and are pairwise disjoint. As above, none of these events have an outcome in common, and thus at most one of them can occur if the experiment is performed.
It is straightforward to generalise this definition to an arbitrary number of events: events are pairwise mutually exclusive, if the sets are mutually disjoint. As above, at most one of them can occur if the experiment is performed.
Consider a random experiment with sample space , and assume that the subsets form a partition of .
- Are the events pairwise mutually exclusive?
- The experiment is performed. Which statement is correct:
-
exactly one of the events must occurs.
-
more than one of the events can occur.
-
it is possible that none of the events occurs.
-
Solution
- Yes
- the first statement is correct, the others are wrong.